Forum Discussion
You can not have any annotations or other text based view members within a GetDataCell. The explanation needs valid members for each dimension. You could use V#Annotation for any comments related to the forecast amount and then V#VarianceExplanation for comments related to that scenario vs Actual. On the View member filter you can add a custom name like this V#VarianceExplanation:Name(Actuals vs AOP).
got this makes sense, so it sounds like your company just has to create some general operating rules about agreeing about what is going to be in V#varianceExplanation....
What about with calculated fields? Would that be helpful at all? Like if we created a dedicated Actuals vs AOP calculated member? and then used V#VarianceExplanation to record the explanation there? I'm not sure if that would work, but it was just a thought / idea? Still rather new here and trying to understand everything that is possible.
- BenEppel2 months agoNew Contributor III
You could setup UD8 Dynamic calcs with different variances like Vs PY, Vs Budget, Vs Prior Quarter, and then submit the comments to those members. The UD8 Calcs would need a formula type of DynamicCalcTextInput.