Transformation Rules

[mgezzele]

Hi All, 

i am presenting to you a situation to understand if what we are trying to do is feasible.

We are currently defining the transformation rules for a Client and these rules are quite complex, including composite logics (multi dimensional) and ranges and lists and masks. 

Based on our tentatives it seems that composite rules only accept masks as type of mapping apart from single code mapping. 

is there a way to use Ranges and Lists in composite mappings?

I.E. A#[40610047;40610099;40620001]:U5#[??1000????;??1001????;??1002????;??1003????;??1004????;??1005????;??1006????;??1007????;??1008????]

Thanks a lot

Marco

[rjgoss]

Yes, you can use Range and Mask type mappings within composite mappings.  As for Lists, I haven't had a reason to try, so not sure, but it would be easy to find out, as long as you use the correct formatting.

Composite with Range          F#1234~4567:U1#ABCD

Composite with Mask (wildcards)          U2#1234??:E#Italy

Composite with List          A#123;456;789:U3#17 (make sure to use semicolons)

Good luck!