How to treat blank values for Source field and wanted to assign it to 'None' Target member
Hi Team, My validation step failed because the source mapping is missing for blank records. I attempted to add a mapping with (blank) for the source value and None for the target value, but it didn’t work. How should blank source values be handled in the mapping? Can you please help me with this if anyone face similar issue ? Thank youAbout Foundation
In this practical guide, The Architect Factory team at OneStream Software explains each part of an implementation, and the design of solutions. Readers will learn the core guiding principles for implementing OneStream from the company’s top team of experts. Beyond offering a training guide, the focus of this book is on the ‘why’ of design and building an application. Manage your Implementation with the OneStream methodology Understand Design and Build concepts Build solutions for the Consolidation of financial data, and develop Planning models Create Data Integration solutions that will feed your models Develop Workflows to guide and manage your End-Users Advance your solutions with Rules and Security Take advantage of detailed Data Reporting using tools such as Analytic Blend, Advanced Excel reporting, and Dashboarding Tune Performance, and optimize your application To access the complete publication, you must purchase either the PDF or the physical copy of the book. Purchases can be made at onestreampress.com. Table of Contents Introduction [Peter Fugere] Methodology and the project [Greg Bankston] Design and Build [Peter Fugere] Consolidation [Eric Osmanski] Planning [Jonathan Golembiewski] Data Integration [John Von Allmen] Workflow [Todd Allen] Rules and Calculations [Nick Kroppe and Chul Smith] - Available Excerpt Security [Jody Di Giovanni] Reporting [Jacqui Slone and Chul Smith] Excel and Spreadsheet Reporting [Nick Blazosky] Analytic Blend [Andy Moore, Sam Richards, and Terry Shea] Introduction to the MarketPlace [Shawn Stalker] Performance Tuning I [Jeff Jones and Tony Dimitrie] - Available Excerpt Performance Tuning II [Jeff Jones and Tony Dimitrie]
Transformation Rules - Possible Bug
I have an issue, since we migrated to V9, OS is adding on its own a space after transforming a member and this prevent us from loading the data to the member. (This is in the validation step when it fails) Data source has been checked, adjusted, and tested in many ways. The extra space doesn't come from here. Transformation rules have also been tested in many ways, and the space is also not here, we event tried one-to-one, masks, all ,and this is not the issue The error is only happening with 2 UD3 members US4 & CA4 both ending in 4, I created a fake one for testing "US41" and this one works fine. I have been checking with OS support, but they just want to repeat over and over the same testing we already did with them on a call To me, after checking all that I could, seems like a bug in the new V9.1, but if anyone has any ideas please let me know.
Application report in workflow
Hi, I have installed the solution 'Application reports' in my application. I have added the report WF_ImportDetail_AccountMapping_RPTAR to my workflow by using a form template. When I click on the report in the workflow i am getting a pop-up screen for a parameter. The report should automatically use WF Profile, WF Scenaro en WF time. How do I set that up? JohnBusiness Rule | One-to-One Transformation - E# Parent to its first E# Base
We need your help to Import flat files: 1. Number of Rows: > 100k 2. Organized under E# Parent Members: a few thousands 3. E# is extended We've been fortunate to be advised to build a BR to generate a one-to-one Transformation Rule file. - E# Parent to its first E# Base Is it possible for you SMEs to be generous enough to share with us/Community: - a sample BR to look up its first E# Base Member of an E# Parent Member - under extended E# - how to call that BR in an Import Workflow Thank you, OS SMEs.
composite mapping rule by period
Hello, I am new to Onestream and trying to solve something that seemed easy but it doesn't work:( We need to map an account by the entity and by the time. I used composite mapping. to be exact; A#[651200]:E#[8*]:T#2019M12} has to be mapped to account A A#[651200]:E#[8*]:T#[2019M3] has to be mapped to the account B - also all other instnaces of #651200 for all other entities are mapped to the acount B. I have only composite mapping for this account. It doesn't work. It totally ignores the time dimension. Any tips? thank you, Ola
