Forum Discussion
For the record, I am aware that the Application Control Manager solution team is aware this is a bit of a sore problem, so we might get something to address it eventually...
Jack, do you have any more current information about ACM and GitHub integration? I'm getting these questions again in classes from students.
- JackLacava2 months ago
OneStream Employee
We have something in the pipeline that hopefully will make it easier to interact with any version control system (or AI, or any other developer tool on one's machine...). Pm me if you're interested in having an early look.
- Wikus2 months agoContributor
Hi Jack,
I am VERY interested in having an early look please!
- rome16 days agoNew Contributor
JackLacavaā I would be interested in testing the integration as well.
- RobbSalzmann9 days agoValued Contributor II
Some thoughts: Please consider not GA'ing this until the solution is a fully integrated end-to-end process. At a high level, I picture configuring OS desktop with the source control repo connection info and a means of pulling the currently checked in code from the repo. Keep all versioning, branching, check in/out etc. in the respective IDE. An IDE plugin should carry over the ability to generate shell assemblies and business rules as the current OS Desktop provides.
I think a not fully integrated solution risks creating more problems than it solves.- JackLacava5 days ago
OneStream Employee
As a platform, we have to be flexible on the tooling we enable. If we mandated Visual Studio or GitHub, for example, we would dramatically simplify the problem landscape but also set a bar that a lot of partners will just not (want to) clear. Instead, we will provide enough to (hopefully) enable any tooling, and provide guidance on standard practices to cover the entire development lifecycle.
Trust me, you'll like it š
Related Content
- 3 years ago
- 2 years ago
- 3 years ago