Version 9.0 Redacting information in Error Log
Dear Community Members, Has anyone experienced information in the log being redacted. I found this in the latest documenation. However, i see no pattern of what is considered sensitive. I have a data table dump in the decimal positions are redacted. I am logging the keys and values of two dictionaries. in both dictionaries the value is an integer. One value is shown while the other value in redacted. Both values come from a text member of a dimension member. In other cases i am logging the name of the business rule and the name of the function. Sometimes the RULENAME is redacted, sometimes it is not. Which leads me to believe that the logic thinks that the name is sensitive?! Is this sensitivity controllable maybe on the app settings on the server? Cause it seems overly sensitive or plainly wrong in determining what is sensitive and what is no.
GetBaseMembers: How can I perform a getmembers on an entity as if it were in a cube view?
Hi Everyone. I wanted to see if there is a way to obtain the entities that are under another one but with a filter, like the following: E#|!PerformPnL_Entity!|.TreeDescendantsInclusive.Where(Text1 StartsWith M_ and (HasChildren = True)) I want to do this in a BR, but I am not sure exactly how to do it or if it is possible, since GetBaseMembers brings all of them and I would like to filter it first so that there are not too many entities to verify. I would appreciate it if you could help me with this question.
Help Needed with Confirmation Rule to Validate Annotations for Thresholds
Hello OS Community. I'm working on a confirmation rule that is supposed to check for the presence of annotations when thresholds are defined. The intended behavior is: If thresholds are present, but no annotation/comment is provided, the rule should fail validation. However, the logic isn't working as expected. Even when no comment is given, the rule still passes and acts as if a comment is provided. Here’s what I need help with Ensuring that the rule correctly identifies missing comments and fails as intended. Identifying what might be wrong in my current logic it seems to incorrectly detect comments even when none exist. Any insights or examples of similar logic would be much appreciated!
Map source account to target account member and Ud4 member
Hi Everyone, I have a source file which contains multiple accounts in the columns for one month. These accounts are not there in the cube. I do not have a ud4 dimension in the source file. Each source account should be mapped to an account and Ud4 member. for ex: Account a001 has to be mapped to account A#a1 and Ud4#cost. Similarly Account b001 has to be mapped to account b#b1 and Ud4#sale. A#[a001]=A#[a1]:UD4#[cost] A#[b001]=A#[b1]:UD4#[sale] How can this be achieved in the transformation rule. Also, the data source needs to have ud4 or not. Thanks, Jeevanapi.data.clearcalculateddata vs. clearing data using databuffer
Hi OS Community, Hope you are doing well! Out of curiosity, I wanted to check which approach is more efficient for clearing data: using api.data.clearcalculateddata or clearing combinations using databuffer? Few examples would be really helpful. Thank you!
Fetch Metadata values from Text file in Transformation Event Handler
Hi Experts, I am working on TransformationEventHandler rule in which we need to read the first 4 columns of a text file that is being uploaded to Workflow Import so I can do some sanity checks and error out if they are not correct. Does anyone have sample code that reads the values of file? I checked everywhere but not much documentation on this. Also, I placed this code in "ParseSourceData" BREventOperationType. Not sure if this is correct or need to put under "ParseTransformationRules"? Thanks in advance, PM
