Forum Discussion
Hi Christian,
First of all, thanks for replying. Second, my apologies for the lack of background.
I am working on a detailed cashflow overview. The cashflow process starts with a mapping table in which we have a source account and flow, which get mapped to a cashflow account. Let's call them, source account, flow account, and target account respectively. This mapping table includes a column for flipping the sign. This is a true/false box.
I would like to retrieve the following. From that mapping table (which is running on the data table manager), I want to return the outcome from that mapping table in the true/false box. So, if the combination of source account + source flow + target account has the flip sign condition set to true or false, I want to retrieve it in a cube view. With the business rule, I am able to retrieve the target account from a parameter (this is a bound parameter coming from another cube view). However, the source account and source flow depend on what we're looking at in the cube view. So, I cannot retrieve them with a parameter. Therefore, I would like to retrieve these values with some sort of api.Pov.Account.MemberId, which is not possible in XFBR in that way.
I hope this was more clear.
Thanks for your help!
There is no api.Pov.Account for xfbr, because the function is called when rendering the outline of the cubeview. You might pass a parameter to the xfbr function, but this is not working with the data of the cubeview only with headers (:name()).
In your case, I would probably use a ud8 dynamic member formula, then you have access to api.Pov.Account.MemberId.
Member formulas can also work with annotation views, so you can show + or - if you like, or a complete formula.
Dimension that only hold dynamic members don't need to be allocated to a cube, they will work in every cube.
I hope this helps and cheers
Christian
- FlorisvdPoel2 years agoNew Contributor III
Hi Christian,
Thanks so much for your answer, appreciate it.
My whole problem actually started when I had it set up with UD8 'signage indicators' so to say. 😁I moved to XFBR because I was not able to retrieve the bound parameter outcome (that I use with the navigation) in my UD8 dynamic calc.
Long story short, if there is a way to retrieve the outcome of a bound parameter in a dynamic calc, my problem is also solved 😀
If you can help me with that, it would be very much appreciated.
Thanks, Christian!
BR,
Floris
- ChristianW2 years agoValued Contributor
FlorisvdPoel wrote:I was not able to retrieve the bound parameter outcome (that I use with the navigation) in my UD8 dynamic calc.
Sorry to say, but this isn't possible either.
I start to understand the problem: You need two account dimensions, source and target. But that's not possible with a cube.
But would it be possible, to place the CF in a UD? That's how we are doing this kind of reporting. In the beginning, it sounds a little strange, but it has a lot of advantages. With this concept, you get a CF statement by Account and by Flow.
- FlorisvdPoel2 years agoNew Contributor III
Hi Christian,
Thank you for your reply.
Placing the CF in a UD doesn't sound too strange, and I will definitely consider it at new implementations. However, this is quite a big change for an up and running system and requires some more discussion.
Thank you for your help.
BR,
Floris
Related Content
- 8 months ago
- 3 years ago
- 4 months ago