Recent Discussions
Including Journal Entries from Different Origin Member in Account Reconciliation Discovery
Hi Community, I’m working on an Account Reconciliation solution where I need to ensure posted journal entries balances are also included in the Account Reconciliation discovery process. Currently, by design the Discovery process only pulls trial balance information already imported and validated in the Stage. Therefore, I wanted to check if there’s a recommended, or best practice approach, to accomplish this requirement. Any guidance or examples would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance for your help!
Need help on the access group of work profile name
Hi Everyone, Need your support I am currently preparing a dashboard to manage user security details in OneStream. As part of this, I need to retrieve and modify Workflow Profile access groups. Specifically, I want to get the Access Group names corresponding to each Workflow Profile (e.g., for Workflow Profile US, the View group is US_View and the Modify group is US_MOD) based on scenario type. Currently, I am able to retrieve the AccessGroupID, but I am unable to get the group names. Could you please provide guidance or confirm the table/approach I should use to map Workflow Profiles to their Access Group names? Your assistance will help in correctly setting up the dashboard and managing user security efficiently. Data Adapter to pick group Data adapter to pick Workflowprofile and assigned entities. Thank you in advance for your support.
Transformation Error of Composite Mapping Type when using "?"
I need some assistance. The following error is displayed during the Load and Transform WF step (v9.0.1.17608): The use of "?" and "*" is discussed in the Design and Reference guide as per below: Requirement: There is an entity with 5 characters with suffix _ICI30 that needs to map to C4500 if the IC has 5 characters, and another with 9 characters with suffix _ICI30 that needs to map to C3000 if the IC has 5 characters. How do I define the rule expression if E#[?????_ICI30]:I#[?????] and E#[?????????_ICI30]:I#[?????] are incorrect?
How to write Smart Integration Function in Assembly
Hi, I have created one one Smart integration function in to transfer file from sftp server to share point server. can we use smart integration function as a file or use existing smart integration function as dependency , not sure just need suggestions.
SaveCustomDataTable behaviour in different Versions of OS
I have used SaveCustomDataTable in OS v9.01 where you need to clear the data before loading the table and it works fine. Recently i was building similar logic in OS v8.2 and noticed that it was truncating my table , is this expected or is there something i am missing it is the standard call: BRApi.Database.SaveCustomDataTable(si, "Application",Table,dt,True)Async processing in a Connector Business Rule
Hi All, I am writing an Connector BR to connect to a system via their API. I first build the rule as a Extender rule so that I can test the logic. So far it works great. It uses Asynchronous processing on all of the web calls. When I try to move that code into a Connector BR, I am having an issue on the GetFieldList part of it. When I try to use it in a data source, I get the following error: Unable to cast object of type 'System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[System.Object]' to type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String]'. I am guessing this is because the Main module in the BR is public async Task<obect> Main so whatever is returned is going to be a Task<object>. Has anyone done Asynchronous processing in the connector rule and had the GetFieldList part working. My only thought to get around this is the write the data to a table/file with the Extender BR then the Connector reads that. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. Scott
Time dependent mappings
Hi I'm look for a solution to perform time dependent mappings. For example: Source Target Prior to Dec 25 x y Dec 25 onwards x z Has anyone come across the need for the before? And if so, what solution did you implement for this? Did you notice any issues with performance etc? Thanks, Mark
Automated Extraction of Transformation rules
We have a recurring requirement to share the transformation rules/logic on a regular basis with downstream teams or auditors. Currently, this is being done manually, which is time-consuming. Is there a way to automate the extraction/export of transformation rules? Some options I’m thinking of: - Can this be done via Business Rules (BR) / Decision Model (DM) modules? - Is it possible to extract or view all applied transformation rules directly through Cube Views? - Has anyone built an automated solution (e.g., a dashboard, cube view, report, or extender rule) to export/list all transformation rules in a readable format? Would really appreciate your thoughts or examples if you’ve implemented something similar. Thanks!
