Hybrid Scenario – Pre-Aggregated Member Setup for Entity Summarization (V8.4)
Hi Team, I’m working on a Hybrid Scenario setup where the goal is to copy data from a source scenario to a management (MGT) scenario. This allows the MGT team to work with the data independently, using their own workflow with high-level access. So far, the base data copy works well. However, I want to summarize entity data in the target scenario so that users only see Entity parent nodes, while maintaining visibility of all other 17 dimension members (Account, UD1-UD8, etc.). To achieve this, I tried creating a dummy parent member (Entity X) in a new Entity dimension that mimics the top-level parent from the legal entity hierarchy (Entity Y). My intention was to use this structure in the Pre-Aggregated Members field in the Hybrid Scenario configuration, effectively copying: Entity X = Entity Y Unfortunately, this method worked successfully in Version 7.4, but does not appear to function as expected in Version 8.4. Maybe in version 9.0 +, we can successfully configure pre-aggregated entity mappings for Hybrid Scenarios? Can we customize this to version 8.0 and above? Would appreciate any advice or examples from the community if you’ve made this work in your applications. Thanks in advance! Chris162Views0likes2CommentsIssue with Zero Input Not Triggering Calculations in OneStream
Hi all, I’ve encountered an issue in OneStream where inputting a value of 0 does not trigger any calculations, while entering 0.1 or any other non-zero value works as expected. From what I understand, this seems to be related to Zero Suppression, which may be preventing the system from storing or processing the zero value. However, I’d like to confirm if this is standard behavior, or if there’s a recommended best practice for handling zeros in data input and calculations (e.g., in cube views or business rules). Thanks!55Views0likes3CommentsOneStream Server Configuration
Hi all, while configuring a local OneStream instance, I know that I have to copy the "Encrypted Connection String For Server" from DataBase Configuration, putting it into the Application Server Configuration File, in the "Database Server Connections" item. I see that there's also a "Is Connection String Encrypted" flag, so I suppose I could set a clear connection string. Is not clear which would be the format of an unencrypted string (I took a look in the Installation Guide but I wasn't able to find what I was looking for...). Since this is a local development instance, there's no need to secure it... Could someone share this knowledge (or point me in the right direction) ? Thanks a lot FabioGSolved24Views0likes2CommentsNeed help on 2 functions GetSessionDataTable and SetSessionDataTable
Hi All, I am trying to use getSessionDataTable and SetSessionDataTable for loading data from a file placed in harvest folder and then using the table to store it in cube with direct approach. Can anyone provide more insight on these functions? How is it work and if there are any challenge of using these functions?24Views0likes1Commentis possible to upload data on the parent member?
hi All, I need to upload data into the new scenario Plan with 5 years and would like to load data in parent membaers (Entity, Account and UD1), I'm using the scenario property "Allow input into Aggegated Consolidation member" but I think that this property is for another purpose. I'm coming from EPM Planning where it could be possible and many people told me that uploading data at any level is possible but cannot find any example. Could somebody help me? Thanks in advance and best Regards. Mario Guerrero50Views0likes2CommentsDisable 'rename journals'
Hi everyone, My employer recently migrated from v7.4 to v8.5, and one of the new 'features' is the ability to rename journals before submission. Due to internal processes we'd like to restrict users from making any changes to journals names (regardless of their status) as they must follow a predefined naming convention. Based on your experience, does anyone know if this is possible? Thanks, SERGIO9Views0likes0CommentsEntity - In Use Feature
Hi all, We have a situation where an Entity was created and incorrectly set up and contains data for period 2024M12 and 2025M3. We decided to create a new Entity and updated the transformation rules to ensure that the data loaded goes to the newly created member and not the old one. We have set the consolidation and ownership percentage of the old entity to 0 as added measure. We are now faced with the challenge of not deleting the member as it contains data. Kindly asking if it is advisable to set the In Use feature in this scenario and is there any impact that would cause. Thanks in advance.Solved58Views0likes3CommentsManual input not possible on one scenario but possibile on another
Hi everyone, I'm having problems in writing data to one scenario through a cubeview. I have 2 scenarios available. If in the cubeview I use one of them, it allows me to manually input data. If I change the scenario, I cannot input data anymore. All the other dimensions are base members and they are unchanged. In addition, I cannot find the setting to allow data input on one specific scenario. I checked the settings of both scenarios and they are identical. Does anyone have any idea how to do it? Thanks!Solved81Views0likes3Comments- 19Views0likes0Comments