Validation Error: No security access to data cell being cleared
Hi Team, We have a client that upload excel templates using xfdrange into OneStream. They have different files per Business Unit (UD2). Two of the files run into the following intersection error during the validation step: All the other files are correct, however, when they upload these two files, all data intersections (from all other files) are suddenly also invalid intersections. For examples, the line listed here is not from either of the two files but from a seperate file that has no errors when uploaded individually). When you would navigate to "Intersection" instead of "invalid Intersection (1)" all data intersections from all files are there. Only the local users get this validation intersection, when I (administrator) would run "Validate" from this screenshot, the error dissapears. Strange thing is: they have uploaded data on this intersection before in previous Forecast Scenarios without errors Security has not changed for either the application, user, workflow profile, entity etc. these two files both have an account that is only used there but is set up in the same way as all the other accounts (and previously could be loaded in other scenarios). Could just be a coincidence. Application Security: ModifyData is set to Everyone One thing to note is that this is a new forecast scenario we recently created for them, however, setup is the same way as the other forecast scenarios in terms of security. I am also having a hard time understanding the error and why it is refering to "clearing data" in the validate step. Anyone that can help me a little bit more in understanding the error or knows what could cause this? Thanks in advance!51Views0likes2CommentsAnyone doing planning at a proxy member?
Hi all, I'm just trying to get a feel for how common this use of proxy members is these days. I've worked for multiple organizations and typically, if we were planning at any level higher than the most granular level of data, we would plan a number representing a group of members, at some 'proxy' member created specifically for planning purposes. That is, we would not use some random existing base member that held actuals. For example: If our dimension hierarchy looks like the one below and we were planning at the Region Level: I would not plan for the entire RegionA by loading my planning data to "South3". Instead, I would create a unique member (say, "RegionA_Plan") and load my data there. Wondering how many companies out there would use the first method rather than the second method and what advantage there would be to this? Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this. RegionA North North1 North2 North3 South South1 South2 South3 East East1 East2 East3 WestSolved33Views0likes4CommentsData Cell is read-only because Parent Workflow Profile has no active Input Profiles
Hi all, I have an Import, Validate, Load workflow that hasn't been used for a while. I'm trying to load in data and I'm getting invalid intersections at the validation stage with the following error message: "Data Cell is read-only because Parent Workflow Profile 'Workflow Name' has no active Input Profiles for the Workflow Channels that are assigned to the Data Cell's Account and/or UD member. Entity = Entity, Account=Volume, Origin=Import" Note I've use italics instead of using our entity names and workflow names. We didn't have this issue before so I'm not sure what has changed. The parent workflow profile stated in the validation message isn't actually the parent workflow profile so I'm totally confused. There is another post on this but I didn't understand the resolution. Could somebody please tell me what I would need to do to fix this? Thanks!Solved4.2KViews0likes4CommentsAbility to refer to a source field in a composite transformation rule
When we created our application years ago for a particular source our account mapping only needed the Source Account to map. Now I have a need to do the account mapping based on a Location Source field that denotes a location for just two records exceptions. Can I make a Composite Rule mapping that somehow includes the location from the Source file to create a composite rule for this exception or is the only solution to now include the source location field on my data source, and modify all the current mappings to have a wildcard for that field except my exceptions that need to be mapped to a different account.29Views0likes2CommentsGet Transformation Errors from a Batch Harvest job
I am running some data loads using Batch Harvest. I want to be able to capture the Validate Transformation and Validate Intersections errors to include in an email. I am able to get the Validate Intersections errors from the application table. Does anyone know how I would get the Validate Transformation errors? If I run the entire job within a BR then I can get the Transformation Errors, but I would rather run it through the Batch Harvest. I appreciate any input. Thank you. ScottValidation Errors mapping to placeholder
Hey Folks, I am looking to map all validation errors that might occur during an automated load to a placeholder member in the UD1 dimension, but i am running into issues as the mask rule approach is not working. Does anyone else have any other way to make this work? Below is what i have tried but i still get kickouts in the validation step of the load process.103Views0likes9CommentsTransformation.... Can I message user if....
As you can see I'm not even sure how to title this post. I have a user from a sub who has asked whether there's a way to create a popup message to the individual trying to import data if they are loading to an incorrect (but viable) intersection? I've been asked similar questions in the past about creating popup messages. I assume there must be a business rule we could create but not sure if such a thing would be possible during an event like importing data. Thoughts anyone?13Views0likes1Comment