Function to return the period associated with a date, when the period is 4-4-5 or 5-4-4
Has anyone written a complex expression that takes a date as an input, and determines the period associated with the date, when periods are not based on calendar ends (for example, 4-4-5, or 5-4-4)? There doesn't appear to be a BRApi function for this, but perhaps I'm missing something. Absent a function, what techniques are recommended? Thanks!20Views0likes0CommentsDerivative Rule
Hello, I'm trying a Derivative Rule where I've one source target account which needs to be mapped to an another account and combination of attributes, the idea is it should create new row for each account attribute, but as I'm using multiple attribute values at once it throwing me an error Please let me know what I'm missing out or what I'm doing wrong from the below expression. A#[56000]=[ABC]:A1#[ACC-*;FTM-*;BTSRR-*;BPR-*;BSC*;CON-*]34Views0likes3CommentsConsolidation- Calcstatus showing CN for all period.
Hi Everyone, We recently migrated from 7.1.3 to 8.4 . after migrations, we are facing issue in Calcstatus- Consolidation from Bottom to Top ( Parent). we tried to consolidated-calcstatus from beginning of the data to till now. But its not running properly or not showing value in parent level. after closing cubeview again its showing CN. is there anyone faced this issue and find the solutions?How to setup transformation rule to map if an item is a child member of a (another) dimension parent
I am looking to create a transformation rule for Accounts to map to a destination if the Department on the record is a child of a specific parent in the OS department dimension. ACCT600 DEPT101 --> ACT_EXP600_100 ACTT600 DEPT321 --> ACT_EXP600_100 Where departments 101 and 321 are descendants of Dept_TotRD2KViews0likes4Commentsomit a derivative rule, but only for a specific period
Hi, I’m currently working on a project where I need to omit a derivative rule, but only for a specific period. I'm looking for the most effective and clean way to achieve this without disrupting other rules or calculations that remain in effect. Does anyone have experience with this or suggestions on how best to approach it? I’d appreciate insights on both technical implementation and best practices to ensure future maintainability. Thank you,187Views0likes2CommentsNew connection requiring a date and scenario transformation rule
I cloned an existing connection that pulls the Scenario and Date from the workflow. The new connection is requiring me setup a New Scenario Transformation rule that is basically Budget --> Budget and time rule 2024M1 --> 2024M1. The connection I cloned doesn't require the additional rules and was pulling Actuals. All my Data Sources, Scenario, and Workflow settings seem the same. Any suggestions on what I am missing? I don't want to maintain the time rules, so that's why I'm trying to see what I'm doing wrong.Solved167Views0likes2CommentsHow to treat blank values for Source field and wanted to assign it to 'None' Target member
Hi Team, My validation step failed because the source mapping is missing for blank records. I attempted to add a mapping with (blank) for the source value and None for the target value, but it didn’t work. How should blank source values be handled in the mapping? Can you please help me with this if anyone face similar issue ? Thank youSolved233Views0likes2Commentsremove transformation profile member by an import
Dear coleagues, when I need to change transformation group within multiple transformation profiles I wanted to export XML file, do the change and then reupload it. Unfortunatelly it add new group but does not remove the old one. I guess the merge approach it to blame. Do you know a way how to do this excersise in more sophisticated way than running a clicking derby? Thanks for help!557Views0likes6Comments