Forum Discussion
FM
3 years agoNew Contributor III
Cube View formatting mixed dimensions
I have a Cube View that is displaying a single dimension in the first column (Departments), and a second dimension (Accounts) in the second column.
In order to match the formatting of the report that is currently in use I’d like it to display in the first column Departments up to the bolded Total row, then accounts from there on out. In essence it would be mix of two different dimensions displayed in the first column.
I would also like for the second column to be hidden. I have made some attempts to match the formatting as I described, but without success.
Do you have any ideas on how to achieve this?
Thank you for your time in advance.
Use:
UD1#Something:name(|MFAccount|) (or UD1#Something:name(|MFAccountDesc|))
A#SomethingElse:name(|MFUD1|) (or A#SomethingElse:name(|MFUD1Desc|))
where needed.
Christian's comment above should work and essentially what I'm going to add a little bit of extra color to. I have a very similar use case to the example you provided.
I would only use Member Expansion 1 in your Rows. If you use your Department dimension in Member Expansion 1 and your Account dimension in Nested Member Expansion 2, you'll have those two columns appear.
Let's assume UD1 is Department in your case, I would recommend the following.
For everything to the bolded Total row you showed, use the following: U1#TotalDepartment.base:A#OPEX:Name(|MFUD1Desc|)
For everything below the bold, use the following: U1#TotalDepartment:A#OPEX.base:Name(|MFAccountDesc|)
7 Replies
- ChristianW
OneStream Employee
Use:
UD1#Something:name(|MFAccount|) (or UD1#Something:name(|MFAccountDesc|))
A#SomethingElse:name(|MFUD1|) (or A#SomethingElse:name(|MFUD1Desc|))
where needed.
- FMNew Contributor III
Thank you for your reply ChristianW!
- aricgreskoContributor III
Christian's comment above should work and essentially what I'm going to add a little bit of extra color to. I have a very similar use case to the example you provided.
I would only use Member Expansion 1 in your Rows. If you use your Department dimension in Member Expansion 1 and your Account dimension in Nested Member Expansion 2, you'll have those two columns appear.
Let's assume UD1 is Department in your case, I would recommend the following.
For everything to the bolded Total row you showed, use the following: U1#TotalDepartment.base:A#OPEX:Name(|MFUD1Desc|)
For everything below the bold, use the following: U1#TotalDepartment:A#OPEX.base:Name(|MFAccountDesc|)
- FMNew Contributor III
ChristianW, Thanks for explaining that in detail. I took your suggestions and applied them and it works as intended! Much appreciated!
- TomGardnerNew Contributor
I know this is 3 years old but hoping maybe I still get a reply.
I'm experiencing the same issue.
For the row that says "Pit & Front End Operations" I am using this filter: A#OpExp:U1#FrontEnd.Base:Name(|MFUD1Desc|)
But the report seems to be ignoring the expansion and only showing me the member U1#FrontEnd.
I was just assuming that I couldn't do an expansion on the U1 when Account is my primary row dimension. But hoping there is a way. Any ideas?
Thanks!
- aricgreskoContributor III
That's a substitution variable used to call out the Account Description within your Member Filter (MF). In my example, when I called out |MFUD1Desc|, I want the row to return the department and when I called out |MFAccountDesc|, I want the row to return the account.
- FMNew Contributor III
In regards, to this U1#TotalDepartment:A#OPEX.base:Name(|MFAccountDesc|), why is the bolded part in between pipes? Thanks
Related Content
- 3 years ago