Recent Discussions
Complex Expression in Transformation Rule - How to exit rule?
So we have a UD2 mapping set up in the List section. What I want is to be able to set up a Complex Expression in the UD2 Composite section so that for certain accounts it does nothing and so moves on to the List section, but for everything else we have a hard coded UD2 (e.g. None). I have no problem with setting the criteria in the Complex Expression, but I don't know if it is even possible to write some code that forces it to skip on out and look at the List mappings? I realise this is maybe a bit back to front compared to how the Composite mappings work, but we have a very tight list of accounts where we need to do the List UD2 mapping, and everything else (which can be any other account) should just go to None.Onestream Certification : Lead architect or Core application architect ?
Hello everyone, I recently attempted to register for a OneStream certification exam and noticed that both the Lead Architect and Core Application Architect certifications are available. Could you please clarify which one is required for my consulting firm to qualify for a higher-level partnership with OneStream? Additionally, I would appreciate any insights into the main differences between these two certifications, as well as the passing score (percentage of correct answers) for each. Finally, if you have already taken one of these exams, I would be grateful if you could share your experience. Thank you in advance!
Transaction Matching Module movement to different environment
We are preparing to move the Transaction Matching (TM) module, an out-of-the-box marketplace solution, from the Development environment to the QAT environment. Could someone please guide me on the process for migrating the database tables, along with the match sets and matching rules created within the TM module? Specifically, is there a way to extract and load these artifacts directly, rather than recreating the entire solution from scratch in the new environment?
Can constraints Slow Things Down in OneStream?
Constraints in OneStream are filters applied to metadata dimensions such as Flow, Accounts, UD1, or specific cash flow lines to narrow the scope of calculations, data retrieval, or Cube View rendering. They’re powerful tools, but when applied too broadly or dynamically, can they degrade performance? Larger evaluation footprint A Flow or Account constraint forces OneStream to check every intersection in that dimension. In dense cubes, this can mean millions of evaluations. 1. Dynamic filters are expensive. Static lists (e.g., A#1000, A#2000, Flow#Operating) resolve quickly. Dynamic logic FilterDim, Boolean conditions, or formula driven sets require runtime computation. Why? 2. Stacked or nested constraints multiply the cost. Does layering constraints across Flows, Accounts, and UDs in OneStream force the system to resolve each filter before executing calculations? 3. Reduced parallelism. When constraints slice across cash flow lines or UD dimensions, the engine can’t fully parallelize tasks. Does more constraint mean fewer threads working freely? Do you agree? Why? Cheers
Backward compatibility in client software
Hi Onestream experts, We need to install client software 9.1.0 for accessing Environment 1, which is running on version 9.1 We could not use the client software 9.1.0 for accessing Environment 2, which is running on version 8.4 Why is the client not backward compatible? This is a very normal situation for any customer, to have different environment in different version. How to solve this? Thanks Suresh
Wrap Text Cube View Onestream
Hello Everyone, Does anyone know if it’s possible to use Wrap Text in comments within OneStream? This feature is available in Excel under cell formatting, but I can’t seem to find it in a OneStream Cube View. The member filter used for comments is V#Annotation. If anyone has a solution or workaround, please advise. Thank you!
